- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-260/22: Action brought on 12 May 2022 — Freixas Montpelt and Others v Committee of the Regions
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0260
62022TN0260
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.6.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 244/47
(Case T-260/22)
(2022/C 244/63)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: David Freixas Montpelt (Berchem-Sainte-Agathe, Belgium), Gustavo Lopez Cutillas (Woluwé Saint Pierre, Belgium), Valeria Schirru (Brussels, Belgium), Svetlozar Andreev (Brussels) (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)
Defendant: Committee of the Regions
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well founded;
—accordingly, annul the list of officials eligible for promotion in the 2021 promotion exercise, in so far as that list does not include the names of Mr Freixas Montpelt at grade AST5, Mr Lopez Cutillas at grade AD6, Ms Schirru at grade SC2 and Mr Andreev Svetlozar at grade AD10;
—in so far as necessary, annul the defendant’s decision of 11 February 2022 rejecting the applicants’ complaints;
—order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the decision of 16 June 2021 is unlawful in that it infringes Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the decision of 16 June 2021 is unlawful in that it infringes the principle of non-discrimination.