- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-105/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 28 February 2017 — Komisia za zashtita na potrebitelite v Evelina Kamenova
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0105
62017CN0105
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 144/32
(Case C-105/17)
(2017/C 144/41)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Komisia za zashtita na potrebitelite
Respondent: Evelina Kamenova
Question referred
1.Must Article 2(b) and (d) of Directive 2005/29/ЕC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair commercial practices be interpreted as meaning that the action of a natural person who is registered on a website for the sale of goods, and who published a total of eight advertisements at the same time for the sale of different items via the website, is the action of a trader within the meaning of the legal definition in Article 2(b), represents a business-to-consumer commercial practice within the meaning of Article 2(d) and comes within the scope of the directive pursuant to Article 3(1) thereof?
Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (Text with EEA relevance).
OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22.
* * *
Language of the case: Bulgarian