- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-752/20: Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2023 — IMG v Commission (Non-contractual liability — OLAF investigations — Press leaks — Material and non-material damage — Causal link — Imputability of the leaks — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Confidentiality of legal advice)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0752
62020TA0752
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 278/18
(Case T-752/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Non-contractual liability - OLAF investigations - Press leaks - Material and non-material damage - Causal link - Imputability of the leaks - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Confidentiality of legal advice)
(2023/C 278/27)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: International Management Group (IMG) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and J.-Y. de Cara, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, J.-F. Brakeland and S. Delaude, acting as Agents)
Re:
By its action under Article 268 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the material and non-material damage which it claims to have suffered as a result of the unlawfulness of the conduct of the European Commission and of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) following a report concerning the applicant drawn up by OLAF.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Orders that the document produced by International Management Group (IMG) as Annex A.21 to the application be removed from the case file;
2.Dismisses the action;
3.Orders IMG to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.
Language of the case: French