- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-162/22: Judgment of the General Court of 19 April 2023 — OQ v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty — Removal from post without reduction of entitlement to a pension — Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0162
62022TA0162
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/30
(Case T-162/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil Service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty - Removal from post without reduction of entitlement to a pension - Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)
(2023/C 189/40)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: OQ (represented by: N. Maes and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment, first, of the European Commission’s decision of 19 May 2021 by which it imposed on him the disciplinary penalty of removal from post without reduction of entitlement to a pension and, secondly, of the decision of 15 December 2021 by which the Commission rejected his complaint.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders OQ to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 198, 16.5.2022.