I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2012/C 227/46
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. (New York, USA) (represented by: C. Aikens, Barrister)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eduardo López Cabré (Barcelona, Spain)
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 26 March 2012 (R 1170/2011-4);
—alternatively, to uphold the Opposition only so far as it relates to the following goods umbrellas, parasols and accessories for umbrellas and parasols; and
—to order the Opponent to pay the costs incurred by the Applicant.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘VOGUE’ for goods and services in classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, 26, 28, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 4 023 041
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The community and national word mark ‘VOGUE’ and the national figurative mark ‘VOGUE moda en lluvia’ for goods in class 18
Decision of the Opposition Division: Partly upheld the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.