- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-64/13: Order of the General Court of 6 November 2014 — ANKO v Commission (Arbitration clause — Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) — Contract concerning the Doc@Hand project — Repayment of the sums advanced — Letter giving notice of the issue of a debit note — Lack of interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0064
62013TB0064
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.1.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 16/37
(Case T-64/13) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Arbitration clause - Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006) - Contract concerning the Doc@Hand project - Repayment of the sums advanced - Letter giving notice of the issue of a debit note - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
(2015/C 016/59)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and A. Cordewener, acting as Agents, assisted by S. Drakakakis, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought under Article 272 TFEU, seeking a declaration by the General Court first, that the applicant is not obliged to repay the whole sum paid to it by the Commission in relation to the Doc@Hand project, concluded under the Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006), secondly, that the applicant is not required to pay flat-rate compensation in relation to that project and, thirdly, that the Commission is not entitled to set off the sums it owes the applicant.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2015016EN.01003702-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2015016EN.01003702-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.