- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-446/24, Freie Hansestadt Bremen: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht der Freien Hansestadt Bremen (Germany) lodged on 25 June 2024 – Freie Hansestadt Bremen v DT
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0446
62024CN0446
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/5220
(Case C-446/24, Freie Hansestadt Bremen)
(C/2024/5220)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Defendant and appellant: Freie Hansestadt Bremen
Applicant and respondent: DT
Question referred
Must Article 3(6) and Article 11(2) of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) be interpreted as precluding a national provision under which a person, whose right to stay has been terminated and against whom a return decision has been issued because that person constitutes a terrorist threat, is generally to be issued with an entry ban of indefinite duration?
—
(1) Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5220/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
—