EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-773/21 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 — AV, AW v European Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary penalty — Downgrading — Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — Parallel national criminal proceedings — Power of attorney — Proportionality of the disciplinary penalty — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CB0773

62021CB0773

November 16, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1074

5.2.2024

(Case C-773/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty - Downgrading - Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - Parallel national criminal proceedings - Power of attorney - Proportionality of the disciplinary penalty - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

(C/2024/1074)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: AV, AW (represented by: J. Martins, advogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: I. Lázaro Betancor and N. Scafarto, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, C. Biz and F. Blanc, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order

1.The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

2.AV and AW shall, in addition to bearing their own costs, pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

3.The European Commission shall bear its own costs.

Language of the case: French.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1074/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 138, 28.3.2022.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia