I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-369/10 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Community trade mark - Community word mark MEMORY - Invalidity proceedings - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c))
2011/C 252/18
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Ravensburger AG (represented by: H. Harte-Bavendamm and M. Goldmann, Rechtsanwälte)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent), Educa Borras SA
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010 in Case T-108/09 Ravensburger v OHIM, by which the Court dismissed the action brought against Decision R 305/2008-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 8 January 2009, dismissing the appeal brought against the Cancellation Division’s decision which declares the word mark ‘MEMORY’ invalid, in respect of goods in Classes 9 and 28, in the context of the application for a declaration of invalidity filed by Educa Borras
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Ravensburger AG shall pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.
* * *
Language of the case: English