I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-750/15)(Actions for annulment - State aid - Renewable energy - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German Law concerning renewable energy sources (EEG 2014) - Aid supporting electricity from renewable sources and reduced EEG surcharge for energy-intensive users - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
(2016/C 410/27)
Language of the case: German
Applicants: Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH (Zeitz, Germany), RWE Power AG (Essen, Germany) and Vattenfall Europe Mining AG (Cottbus, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein, K. Dingemann and M. Kottmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Hermann and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)
Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 5081 final of 23 July 2014 concerning State aid scheme SA. 38632 (2014/N) implemented by the Federal Republic of Germany (EEG 2014 — Reform of the Renewable Energy Law).
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Mitteldeutsche Braunkohlengesellschaft mbH, RWE Power AG and Vattenfall Europe Mining AG shall pay the costs.
*
Language of the case: German.
(1) OJ C 59, 15.2.2016.