EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-449/08: Action brought on 2 October 2008 — S.L.V. Elektronik v OHIM — Jiménez Muñoz (LINE)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0449

62008TN0449

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/36

(Case T-449/08)

(2008/C 327/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: S.L.V. Elektronik GmbH (Übach-Palenberg, Germany) (represented by: C. König, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Angel Jiménez Muñoz (Gelida, Spain)

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 18 July 2008 in Case R 759/2007-4 in so far as registration of the trade mark applied for (003316908) is refused in respect of ‘mains-operated lights, lighting apparatus and installations, stage effects lighting apparatus; electric lamps; individual parts for the aforesaid goods’; and order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: S.L.V. Elektronik GmbH

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘LINE’ for goods in class 11 — registration No 3 316 908

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Angel Jiménez Muñoz

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative and word marks ‘Line’ for goods and services in classes 9, 35, 37 and 38

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment in part of the decision of the Opposition Division

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94, as there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks in opposition. Furthermore, the Board of Appeal did not proceed on the basis of the trade mark applied for but on the basis of a design that was not identical.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia