- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-157/23: Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2024 – Kneipp v EUIPO – Patou (Joyful by nature)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0157
62023TA0157
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/3609
17.6.2024
(Case T-157/23)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Joyful by nature - Earlier EU word mark JOY - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Evidence in support of the reputation - Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark)
(C/2024/3609)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Kneipp GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Pejman, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Jean Patou (Paris, France)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 January 2023 (Case R 532/2022-2).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
(1)
OJ C 173, 15.5.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3609/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
—