EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-375/25, Sotsialno podpomagane Varna: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Varna (Bulgaria) lodged on 5 June 2025 – Yu.Sht. v Direktor na Direktsia Sotsialno podpomagane Varna

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0375

62025CN0375

June 5, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/4579

(Case C-375/25, Sotsialno podpomagane Varna)

(C/2025/4579)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Yu.Sht.

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Sotsialno podpomagane’ Varna

Questions referred

Does the principle of equal treatment provided for in Article 11 of Directive 2003/109 (1) allow a national provision, such as Article 3(5) of the ZSPD (Bulgarian Law on family benefits for children), which restricts the entitlement to a family benefit for children within the meaning of Article 7(1) of that law to third-country nationals entitled to permanent residency in the Republic of Bulgaria if the receipt of that benefit is not provided for in another law or in an international treaty to which the Republic of Bulgaria is bound as a contracting State?

Must Article 11(4) in conjunction with recital 13 of Directive 2003/109 be interpreted as meaning that every family benefit constitutes a core benefit within the meaning of those provisions, or is it for the national court to assess whether a specific benefit constitutes a core benefit? If the latter is found to be the case, what criteria should be used to make that assessment and what circumstances should be taken into account?

Is it relevant to the classification of a family benefit, such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, as a core benefit that the applicants have the right, under the same conditions as Bulgarian nationals, to other social assistance intended to meet basic needs, but have not exercised that right or do not meet the conditions for it?

Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents (OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4579/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia