- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-217/22: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2023 — Lifestyle Equities v EUIPO — Greenwich Polo Club (GREENWICH POLO CLUB GPC 2002) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark GREENWICH POLO CLUB GPC 2002 — Earlier EU figurative mark BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB — Relative ground for invalidity — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0217
62022TA0217
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/14
(Case T-217/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark GREENWICH POLO CLUB GPC 2002 - Earlier EU figurative mark BEVERLY HILLS POLO CLUB - Relative ground for invalidity - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2023/C 134/19)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Lifestyle Equities CV (Amstelveen, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Terpstra, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Greenwich Polo Club, Inc. (Greenwich, Connecticut, United States)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 February 2022 (Case R 1063/2021-4).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Lifestyle Equities CV and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear their own respective costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.