I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-564/15) (1)
((Actions for annulment - Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility - Act not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))
(2016/C 454/46)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Glazener, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and J. Samnadda, acting as Agents)
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the email of the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) of 17 July 2015, relating to the proposal submitted by the applicant in response to the call for proposals launched under the Connecting Europe Facility on the basis of the Multi-Annual Work Programme adopted in 2014 pursuant to Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 of 26 March 2014 establishing the 2014 Multi-Annual Work Programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020.
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV is ordered to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.