I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Civil service - Officials - Vacancy notice - Application for interinstitutional transfer - First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations - Transfer refusal - Priority order - Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Duty of care - Corrigendum)
(2023/C 179/41)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: ZR (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: G. Predonzani and K. Tóth, acting as Agents)
By her action based on Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 September 2020 rejecting her application for a transfer to EUIPO.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders ZR to pay the costs.
OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.