I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 034/53)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Stagecoach Group plc (Perth, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Jacobs, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘MEGABUS.COM’ — Application for registration No 1 1 1 31 216
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 October 2014 in Case R 1894/2013-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the contested decision;
—Order Community trade mark No 1 1 1 31 216‘MEGABUS.COM’ be registered for all goods and services, or partially registered for some goods and services;
—Order Community trade mark No 1 1 1 31 216‘MEGABUS.COM’, in the alternative, be registered at least partially in respect of ‘provision of passenger transport services’ for which evidence of acquired distinctiveness has been shown;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Articles 7(1)(c) and 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.