- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-845/14: Action brought on 24 December 2014 — August Brötje v OHIM (HydroComfort)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0845
62014TN0845
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.3.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 89/32
(Case T-845/14)
(2015/C 089/38)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: August Brötje GmbH (Rastede, Germany) (represented by: S. Pietzcker and C. Spintig, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘HydroComfort’ — Application No 12 233 763
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 in Case R 1302/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.