- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-833/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de l’entreprise de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 31 December 2018 — SI, Brompton Bicycle Ltd v Chedech / Get2Get
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0833
62018CN0833
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.3.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 82/19
(Case C-833/18)
(2019/C 82/21)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: SI, Brompton Bicycle Ltd
Defendant: Chedech / Get2Get
Questions referred
—Must EU law, in particular Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, which determines, inter alia, the various exclusive rights conferred on copyright holders, in Articles 2 to 5 thereof, be interpreted as excluding from copyright protection works whose shape is necessary to achieve a technical result?
—In order to assess whether a shape is necessary to achieve a technical result, must account be taken of the following criteria:
—The existence of other possible shapes which allow the same technical result to be achieved?
—The effectiveness of the shape in achieving that result?
—The intention of the alleged infringer to achieve that result?
—The existence of an earlier, now expired, patent on the process for achieving the technical result sought?
Language of the case: French
(OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10)