- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-586/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 December 2013 — Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Fixing of the gross price of road pavement bitumen — Fixing of a rebate for road builders — Evidence — Principle of equal treatment — Unlimited jurisdiction — Proportionality of the fine — Review by the Court)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CA0586
62012CA0586
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.2.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 52/21
(Case C-586/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Fixing of the gross price of road pavement bitumen - Fixing of a rebate for road builders - Evidence - Principle of equal treatment - Unlimited jurisdiction - Proportionality of the fine - Review by the Court)
2014/C 52/36
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Appellant: Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV (represented by: E. Pijnacker Hordijk, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agent)
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 in Case T-357/06 Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.