- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-234/21: Action brought on 30 April 2021 — Cristalfarma v EUIPO — Reinhard Kosch (STILAXX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0234
62021TN0234
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 242/53
(Case T-234/21)
(2021/C 242/75)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Cristalfarma Srl (Milano, Italy) (represented by: R. Almaraz Palmero, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Reinhard Kosch (Weyregg, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark STILAXX — Application for registration No 16 160 152
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 February 2021 in Case R 1339/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener party, Reinhard Kosch, to pay all the costs of the dispute before the General Court, including those relating to the procedure before the Fifth Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.