I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.4.2014
EN
(Case T-71/14)
(2014/C 129/36)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Swatch AG (Biel, Switzerland) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Panavision Europe Ltd (Greenford, United Kingdom)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 November 2013 given in Case R 470/2012-2.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SWATCHBALL’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 6 543 524
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: International Registrations and Community trade mark registrations of the figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘swatch’ and the word mark ‘SWATCH’
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) CTMR.
* * *