- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-645/21: Order of the General Court of 7 April 2022 — Bloom v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 — European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund — Financial support granted under shared management with the Member States — Ineligible operations or expenditure — Derogations from ineligibility — Association for the protection of the marine environment — Legislative act — No individual concern — No direct concern — Right to effective judicial protection — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0645
62021TB0645
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 266/28
(Case T-645/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Common fisheries policy - Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 - European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund - Financial support granted under shared management with the Member States - Ineligible operations or expenditure - Derogations from ineligibility - Association for the protection of the marine environment - Legislative act - No individual concern - No direct concern - Right to effective judicial protection - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 266/35)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Bloom (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Saynac and L. Chovet-Ballester, lawyers)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: G. Ricci and I. Terwinghe, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: F. Naert and A. Nowak-Salles, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 (OJ 2021 L 247, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the European Commission’s application to intervene.
3.Bloom shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
4.The Commission shall bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 481, 29.11.2021.
* * *
Language of the case: French.