- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-178/17: Action brought on 21 March 2017 — W&O medical esthetics v EUIPO — Fidia farmaceutici (HYALSTYLE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0178
62017TN0178
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 144/58
(Case T-178/17)
(2017/C 144/79)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: W&O medical esthetics GmbH (Oberursel, Germany) (represented by: A. Finkentey, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fidia farmaceutici SpA (Abano Terme, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘HYALSTYLE’ — EU trade mark No 11 645 471
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 January 2017 in Case R 872/2016-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.