I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
27.11.2023
(Case T-435/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark PASCELMO - Earlier EU word mark PASCOE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2023/979)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH (Gießen, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, S. Brandstätter, S. Clotten and C. Schmitt, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl, J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Novartis Pharma AG (Basle, Switzerland)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 May 2022 (Case R 1890/2021-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH to pay the costs.
Language of the case: English.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/979/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)