EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-724/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 28 December 2020 — Paget Approbois SAS v Depeyre entreprises SARL, Alpha Insurance A/S and Alpha Insurance A/S v Paget Approbois SAS, Depeyre entreprises SARL

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0724

62020CN0724

December 28, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/25

(Case C-724/20)

(2021/C 79/31)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Paget Approbois SAS, Alpha Insurance A/S

Defendants: Depeyre entreprises SARL, Alpha Insurance A/S, Paget Approbois SAS

Questions referred

1.Must Article 292 of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) (1) be interpreted as meaning that the pending lawsuit brought before the court of a Member State by the creditor of an insurance compensation claim to obtain the settlement of that claim by an insurance undertaking subject to winding-up proceedings pending in another Member State, concerns, within the meaning of that directive, an asset or a right of which the insurance undertaking has been divested?

2.If the first question is answered in the affirmative, is the law of the Member State in which the proceedings are pending intended to govern all the effects of the winding-up proceedings on the pending lawsuit?

In particular, should it be applied in so far as it:

provides that the opening of such proceedings results in the suspension of the pending lawsuit;

subjects the resumption of the proceedings to the claim for insurance compensation being lodged against the estate of the insurance undertaking by the creditor and to the bodies responsible for the winding-up proceedings being summoned;

and precludes an order to pay the insurance compensation, since such an order can no longer be the subject of a judgment except relating to the determination and fixing the amount of the compensation?

(1) OJ 2009 L 335, p. 1.

* * *

(1) Language of the case: French.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia