I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
()
2010/C 317/67
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Häfele GmbH & Co. KG (Nagold, Germany) (represented by M. Eck and J. Dönch, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2010 in Case R 338/2010-1;
—order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘Mixfront’ for goods in Classes 6 and 20.
Decision of the Examiner: Application refused.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) as the Community trade mark concerned is distinctive, is not descriptive and is not a name that has become customary.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).