EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2008.#Nortrail Transport GmbH v Commission of the European Communities.#Customs Union - External Community transit operation - Fishery products originating in Norway - Application for remission and repayment of import duties - Fairness clause - Regulations (EEC) No 2913/92 and No 2454/93 - Special situation - Retroactive opening of tariff quotas.#Case T-496/04.

ECLI:EU:T:2008:376

62004TJ0496

September 16, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-496/04)

Customs Union – External Community transit operation – Fishery products originating in Norway – Application for remission and repayment of import duties – Fairness clause – Regulations (EEC) No 2913/92 and No 2454/93 – Special situation – Retroactive opening of tariff quotas

Own resources of the European Communities – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Fairness clause introduced by Article 239 of the Community Customs Code and Article 905 of implementing Regulation No 2454/93 – Special situation (Decision No 1/94 of EC-Norway Joint Committee, Art. 17(7); Council Regulations No 2913/92, Art. 239, No 992/95 and No 3061/95, Art. 2; Commission Regulation No 2454/93, Art. 905(1); Council Decision No 95/312, Art. 5 and Annex I) (see paras 40-44, 48, 51, 53-54, 58-59, 61, 64-69)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision REM 15/02 of 1 October 2004, finding that the repayment of import duties to the applicant, which are the subject of the application made by the Federal Republic of Germany, is not justified.

Operative part

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Nortrail Transport GmbH to pay its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia