- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-554/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 — European Commission v Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI), Hellenic Republic (Appeal — Competition — Article 86(3) EC — Maintenance of preferential rights granted by the Hellenic Republic in favour of a public undertaking for the exploration and exploitation of lignite deposits — Infringement — Decision — Incompatibility with EU law — Subsequent decision — Establishment of specific measures — Solution to the anti-competitive effects of the infringement — Action for annulment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CA0554
62012CA0554
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.9.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 315/7
(Case C-554/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - Competition - Article 86(3) EC - Maintenance of preferential rights granted by the Hellenic Republic in favour of a public undertaking for the exploration and exploitation of lignite deposits - Infringement - Decision - Incompatibility with EU law - Subsequent decision - Establishment of specific measures - Solution to the anti-competitive effects of the infringement - Action for annulment))
2014/C 315/09
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou and A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Oikonomou, dikigoros)
Other parties to the proceedings: Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) (represented by: P. Anestis, dikigoros), Hellenic Republic (represented by: P. Mylonopoulos, M.-T. Marinos and K. Boskovits, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in DEI v Commission, T-421/09, EU:T:2012:450;
2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Reserves the costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.
Language of the case: Greek