I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
29.4.2024
(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Opinion of the Council’s legal service regarding a proposal by the Commission concerning an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 and regarding advice issued by the Aarhus Committee - Partial refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of legal advice - Legal opinions that are particularly sensitive in nature or have a particularly wide scope going beyond the context of the legislative process in question - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest regarding international relations - Overriding public interest)
(C/2024/2754)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: ClientEarth AISBL (Ixelles, Belgium), Päivi Leino-Sandberg (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: O. Brouwer and T. van Helfteren, lawyers, and S. Gallagher, Solicitor)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Saez Moreno and A. Maceroni, acting as Agents)
By their actions under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of the decisions contained in the letters with reference numbers SGS 21/2869 and SGS 21/2870 of the Council of the European Union of 9 August 2021, refusing them access in part to document 8721/21.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decisions contained in the letters with references SGS 21/2869 and SGS 21/2870 of the Council of the European Union of 9 August 2021 refusing access in part to Document 8721/21 by ClientEarth AISBL and by Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg;
2.Orders the Council to pay the costs.
—
(1)
OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2754/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
—
* Language of the case: English.