EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Joined Cases T- 682/21 and T 683/21: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2024 – ClientEarth and Leino-Sandberg v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0682

62021TA0682

March 13, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2754

29.4.2024

(Joined Cases T- 682/21 and T 683/21)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Opinion of the Council’s legal service regarding a proposal by the Commission concerning an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 and regarding advice issued by the Aarhus Committee - Partial refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of legal advice - Legal opinions that are particularly sensitive in nature or have a particularly wide scope going beyond the context of the legislative process in question - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest regarding international relations - Overriding public interest)

(C/2024/2754)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: ClientEarth AISBL (Ixelles, Belgium), Päivi Leino-Sandberg (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: O. Brouwer and T. van Helfteren, lawyers, and S. Gallagher, Solicitor)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Saez Moreno and A. Maceroni, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their actions under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of the decisions contained in the letters with reference numbers SGS 21/2869 and SGS 21/2870 of the Council of the European Union of 9 August 2021, refusing them access in part to document 8721/21.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls the decisions contained in the letters with references SGS 21/2869 and SGS 21/2870 of the Council of the European Union of 9 August 2021 refusing access in part to Document 8721/21 by ClientEarth AISBL and by Ms Päivi Leino-Sandberg;

2.Orders the Council to pay the costs.

(1)

OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2754/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

* Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia