- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-634/19: Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2022 — FC v EUAA (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Pre-disciplinary proceedings — Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities — OLAF Report — Principle of sound administration — Right to be heard — Principle of impartiality — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Liability — Close link with the claim for annulment)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0634
62019TA0634
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 237/46
(Case T-634/19) (*)
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Pre-disciplinary proceedings - Suspension, withholding of remuneration and prohibition on access to EUAA’s premises and facilities - OLAF Report - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Principle of impartiality - Manifest error of assessment - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Liability - Close link with the claim for annulment)
(2022/C 237/57)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: FC (represented by: V. Christianos, A. Skoulikis and M.-C. Vlachoy, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) (represented by: P. Eyckmans and M. Stamatopoulou, acting as Agents, and A. Guillerme and T. Bontinck, lawyers)
Re:
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Union Agency for Asylum (EUAA) of [confidential] by which that agency suspended her and of the decision of [confidential] by which it rejected her complaint of [confidential] and, second, compensation for the harm she claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders FC to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Greek.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140