- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-304/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Semtee (caldea) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community figurative mark caldea — Earlier international word mark BALEA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0304
62010TA0304
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.11.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 347/30
(Case T-304/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the Community figurative mark caldea - Earlier international word mark BALEA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 347/49
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: O. Bludovsky and P. Hiller, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Semtee (Escaldes Engornay, Andorra) (represented by: É. Guissart, lawyer)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 April 2010 (Case R 899/2009-1), relating to opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG and Semtee.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), in addition to bearing its own costs;
3.Orders each party to bear its own costs relating to the intervention of Semtee.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.