- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-576/14 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 June 2015 — Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft v European Commission, European Ombudsman (Appeal — Action for annulment — Refusal by the Commission to bring proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations — Inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CB0576
62014CB0576
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.9.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 320/13
(Case C-576/14 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - Action for annulment - Refusal by the Commission to bring proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations - Inadmissibility and lack of jurisdiction of the General Court - Appeal in part manifestly unfounded and in part manifestly inadmissible))
(2015/C 320/18)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Appellant: Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft (represented by: K. Pap, ügyvéd)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Ombudsman
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Mirelta Ingatlanhasznosító kft shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.