- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-804/23 P and C-805/23 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 February 2025 – Nutmark and Piamark v Commission (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) – Granting of tax advantages to undertakings – Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic – Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final – Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU – Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CB0804
62023CB0804
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2835
(Joined Cases C-804/23 P
and C-805/23 P)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Madeira Free Zone (Portugal) - Granting of tax advantages to undertakings - Aid scheme implemented by the Portuguese Republic - Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final - Decision taken by the European Commission pursuant to Article 108(2) TFEU - Implementation of existing aid in breach of a condition ensuring compatibility of the aid with the internal market)
(C/2025/2835)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Appellants: Nutmark Lda. (Zona Franca de Madeira) (C-804/23 P) (represented by: F. Lança Martins, C. Marques Aparício and P. Vidal Matos, advogados); Piamark Lda. (Zona Franca de Madeira) (C-805/23 P) (represented by: F. Lança Martins, C. Marques Aparício and P. Vidal Matos, advogados)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: I. Barcew and P. Caro de Sousa, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeals are dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.
2.Nutmark Lda. (Zona Franca de Madeira) and Piamark Lda. (Zona Franca de Madeira) shall pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3143.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2835/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—