I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-796/17) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark MOULDPRO - Absolute ground for invalidity - Bad faith - Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Relative grounds for invalidity - Article 60(1)(b) and Article 8(3) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Article 60(1)(c) and Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2019/C 122/19)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Mouldpro ApS (Ballerup, Denmark) (represented by: W Rebernik, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: P. Sipos and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Wenz Kunststoff GmbH & Co. KG (Lüdenscheid, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 October 2017 (Case R 2153/2015-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mouldpro and Wenz Kunststoff.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mouldpro ApS to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English
OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.