EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-695/21: Action brought on 28 October 2021 — Alauzun and Others v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0695

62021TN0695

October 28, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

3.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 2/45

(Case T-695/21)

(2022/C 2/62)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Virginie Alauzun (Saint Cannat, France) and 774 other applicants (represented by: F. Di Vizio, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

declare that the European Commission (EC) unlawfully failed to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the preclinical phase for the mRNA-technology vaccines;

order the European Commission to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the preclinical phase for mRNA-technology vaccines not yet authorised under the EMA procedure;

order the European Commission to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the pharmacovigilance phase for mRNA-technology vaccines already authorised under the EMA procedure;

request the Commission to disclose the following information:

the clear legislative basis as to why the testing at issue was not included in the preclinical and pharmacovigilance testing phases;

the regulation setting out the mandatory checks required for the authorisation of mRNA-technology vaccines.

order the European Commission to pay all the costs of the applicants.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants allege an infringement of EU law and a failure to act on the part of the Commission. The applicants submit in that regard that the Commission did not comply with its obligation arising under Article 168 TFEU to guarantee a ‘high level of human health protection’ by granting a conditional marketing authorisation to mRNA-technology vaccines in the absence of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity studies.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia