EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 February 1990. # Gemeente Amsterdam and Stichting Vrouwenvakschool voor Informatica Amsterdam (VIA) v Commission of the European Communities. # European Social Fund - Action for the annulment of a refusal to grant an application for financial assistance. # Case C-213/87.

ECLI:EU:C:1990:48

61987CJ0213

February 7, 1990
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61987J0213

European Court reports 1990 Page I-00221 Pub.RJ Page Pub somm

Summary

When it is not clear from the description of the proposed course contained in the application that the training fits in with the policies adopted to meet Community priorities laid down by the Council, the Commission does not commit a manifest error of assessment by refusing to grant assistance from the Fund.

The Commission is also justified in rejecting an application completely, without considering the possibility of granting it in part in view of the fact that the planned training is not entirely outside the priority sphere, if the application is submitted in such a way that it is impossible to separate the courses which qualify and those which do not.

The question whether the statement of grounds for a decision meets those requirements must be assessed with regard not only to its wording but also to its context and to all the legal rules governing the matter in question.

The conciseness of the statement of reasons for a decision by which the Commission refuses assistance from the European Social Fund for a vocational training course is an unavoidable consequence of the processing by computer of several thousand applications for assistance upon which the Commission must adjudicate within a short period.

A more detailed statement of reasons in support of each individual decision would therefore be likely to compromise the rational and efficient allocation of the financial assistance from the Fund.

Parties

In Case C-213/87

(1) Gemeente Amsterdam,

(2) Stichting Vrouwenvakschool voor Informatica Amsterdam (VIA),

represented by J. Werner and W. D. T. D. Wiarda, of the Amsterdam Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Jacques Loesch, 8 rue Zithe,

applicants,

Commission of the European Communities, represented by Julian Currall and Pieter-Jan Kuyper, members of its Legal Department, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the office of Georgios Kremlis, also a member of its Legal Department, Wagner Centre, Kirchberg,

defendant,

APPLICATION for a declaration that Commission Decision C(87) 0670 of 31 March 1987 concerning assistance from the European Social Fund for the financing of schemes submitted by the Kingdom of the Netherlands for 1987 is void,

composed of: F. A. Schockweiler, President of Chamber, G. F. Mancini and T. F. O'Higgins, Judges,

hereby:

Operative part

(1) Dismisses the application;

(2) Orders the applicants to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia