- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-417/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 21 June 2022 — AB v Disziplinarrat der Österreichischen Apothekerkammer
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0417
62022CN0417
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.8.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 326/11
(Case C-417/22)
(2022/C 326/16)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: AB
Respondent authority: Disziplinarrat der Österreichischen Apothekerkammer
Question referred
Must Articles 87(3) and 90 of Directive 2001/83/EC, (1) as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC, (2) be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which prohibits price-based advertising of medicinal products?
(1) Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67).
(2) Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 amending Directive 2001/83/EC on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 34).