EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-42/08: Action brought on 24 January 2008 — Shetland Islands Council v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0042

62008TN0042

January 1, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

12.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/35

(Case T-42/08)

(2008/C 92/71)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Shetland Islands Council (represented by: E. Whiteford, Barrister, R. Murray, Solicitor and R. Thompson, QC)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Annulment of Articles 1(2), 3, 4 and 5 of the decision; and

the costs of this application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is a public authority that made payments to the fisheries sector under the scope of two general aid measures, named ‘Aid to Fish Catching and Processing Industry’ and ‘Aid to the Fish Farming Industry’ consisting of different types of aid schemes. The Commission found that the aid which the United Kingdom implemented on the basis of the ‘Fishing Vessel Modernisation Scheme’ was incompatible with the common market, in so far as it concerned aid granted for the modernisation projects concerning capacity in terms of tonnage or power.

By means of its application, the applicant seeks partial annulment pursuant to Article 230 EC of Commission Decision C 37/2006 (ex NN 91/2005) of 13 November 2007 concerning the Fishing Vessel Modernisation Scheme implemented in the United Kingdom. In particular, the applicant seeks annulment of Article 1(2), 3, 4, and 5 of the contested decision on two grounds:

(1)The Commission allegedly erred in law in finding that payments for replacement or improvement of engines that do not affect the gross tonnage or power of any vessel ‘concern capacity in terms of tonnage or power’ within the meaning of Article 9(1)(c)(i) of Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 (1), and are thus incompatible with the common market;

(2)The Commission erred in law in finding that recovery of payments would be compatible with:

(a)Article 14(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 (2);

(b)the general principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations and of equality of treatment.

(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 2792/1999 of 17 December 1999 laying down the detailed rules and arrangements regarding Community structural assistance in the fisheries sector (OJ L 337, p. 10).

(2) Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ L 83, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia