- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-391/23: Action brought on 13 July 2023 — Imerys Aluminates Groupe v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0391
62023TN0391
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.9.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 314/16
(Case T-391/23)
(2023/C 314/19)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Imerys Aluminates Groupe (Paris, France) (represented by: Y. Martinet, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that the European Commission, by a document of 22 July 2019 entitled ‘Frequently Asked Questions on the Free Allocation Rules for the EU ETS post-2020’, adopted an interpretation which adversely affects the applicant and which is binding on the Member States, as interpreted by the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France) (a national court of last instance);
—order the European Commission to pay compensation for the damage suffered by the company Imerys Aluminates as a result of the adoption of the document of 22 July 2019 entitled ‘Frequently Asked Questions on the Free Allocation Rules for the EU ETS post-2020’, calculated at EUR 40 075 347;
—order the European Commission to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the Commission acted wrongfully in adopting the document of 22 July 2019 entitled ‘Frequently Asked Questions on the Free Allocation Rules for the EU ETS post-2020’ (‘the FAQ’). This plea is divided into three parts:
—the first part, alleging breach of the principle of legitimate expectations;
—the second part, alleging breach of the principle of legal certainty;
—the third part, alleging infringement of Article 6 of the Aarhus Convention.
2.Second plea in law, alleging failure to observe the principle of legal certainty, should Implementing Regulation No 2021/447 (1) be interpreted as implicitly setting out the rules of interpretation explicitly set out in the FAQ of 22 July 2019.
(1) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/447 of 12 March 2021 determining revised benchmark values for free allocation of emission allowances for the period from 2021 to 2025 pursuant to Article 10a(2) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2021 L 87, p. 29).