- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Opinion of Mr Advocate General Lenz delivered on 25 February 1988. # Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Failure to implement Council Directive 82/470/EEC in national law - Effective exercise of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services in respect of activities of self-employed persons in certain services incidental to transport and travel agencies and in storage and warehousing. # Case 283/86.
ECLI:EU:C:1988:102
61986CC0283
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Important legal notice
61986C0283
European Court reports 1988 Page 03271
Opinion of the Advocate-General
Mr President, Members of the Court, 1 . In the present proceedings for failure to fulfil obligations the Commission of the European Communities, the applicant, seeks a declaration that by failing to adopt within the prescribed period the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 82/470/EEC of 29 June 1982 on measures to facilitate the effective exercise of freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services in respect of activities of self-employed persons in certain services incidental to transport and travel agencies ( ISIC Group 718 ) and in storage and warehousing ( ISIC Group 720 ), ( 1 ) the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under the directive and under the third paragraph of Article 189 and the first paragraph of Article 5 of the EEC Treaty .
2 . Article 8 of the directive provides that the Member States are to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the directive within 18 months of its notification and must forthwith inform the Commission thereof . That period expired on 2 January 1984 .
3 . The defendant does not deny that the requisite measures have not been adopted in Belgium in order to comply with the directive within the prescribed period .
4 . Although we have today heard at the hearing that implementing measures in respect of part of the directive have in the mean time been adopted by way of a Royal Decree, there is no doubt that that was not done within the prescribed period .
(*) Translated from the German . ( 1 ) OJ 1982, L 213, p . 1 .