- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-379/24: Action brought on 25 July 2024 – MSG Frucht v EUIPO (Götterfrucht)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0379
62024TN0379
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/5328
(Case T-379/24)
(C/2024/5328)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: MSG Frucht GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark Götterfrucht – Application for registration No 18 850 290
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 May 2024 in Case R 61/2024-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94 and Article 95 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 96 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5328/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—