I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Johnson & Johnson GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Gérard, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Simca Srl (Cesano Boscone (MI), Italy)
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 November 2008 in case R 175/2008-1;
—Allow the opposition and reject the trade mark application No 4 584 587 for the figurative mark ‘YourCare’; and
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘YourCare’, for goods in classes 3, 8 and 21
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration No 2 913 574 of the word mark ‘Young Care’ for goods in classes 3 and 5; German trade mark registration No 30 416 018 of the figurative mark ‘bebe young care’ for goods and services in classes 3, 21 and 44; German trade mark registration No 30 414 452 of the word mark ‘Young Care’ for goods in class 21.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Allowed the opposition in its entirety and rejected the Community trade mark application
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that there was no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned; Infringement of Article 74(1) of Council Regulation 40/94 as the Board of Appeal failed to take into account factual evidence provided by the applicant.