EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 1981. # Dominique Noëlle Oberthür v Commission of the European Communities. # Case 24/79 - Costs.

ECLI:EU:C:1981:207

61979CO0024

September 17, 1981
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61979O0024

European Court reports 1981 Page 02229

Parties

IN CASE 24/79 - COSTS

DOMINIQUE NOELLE OBERTHUR

Grounds

ARTICLE 73 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE PROVIDES THAT , IN ADDITION TO SUMS PAYABLE TO WITNESSES AND EXPERTS AND THE COSTS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 72 , ' ' EXPENSES NECESSARILY INCURRED BY THE PARTIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS , IN PARTICULAR THE TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES AND THE REMUNERATION OF AGENTS , ADVISERS OR LAWYERS ' ' , SHALL BE REGARDED AS RECOVERABLE COSTS .

IT FOLLOWS FROM THAT PROVISION THAT IN GENERAL THE TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES WHICH ARE RECOVERABLE ARE ESSENTIALLY THOSE INCURRED BY AGENTS , ADVISERS OR LAWYERS . HOWEVER , THE TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES OF THE APPLICANT HIMSELF ARE ALSO RECOVERABLE IF HIS PRESENCE AT THE HEARING IS NECESSARY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS .

THIS MAY BE THE CASE IF THE PRESENCE OF THE APPLICANT IN PERSON IS REQUIRED BECAUSE THE COURT HAS REQUESTED IT , OR BECAUSE THE HEARING IS CONCERNED WITH THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE RELATING TO EVENTS EXPERIENCED BY THE APPLICANT , OR BECAUSE THE COURSE OF SUCH EVENTS IS EXTREMELY COMPLICATED AND IS THE MAIN POINT AT ISSUE BEFORE THE COURT .

NONE OF THESE POSSIBILITIES APPLIED IN THIS CASE . THE FACTS NECESSARY FOR DECIDING THE ISSUE WERE LARGELY CONTAINED IN THE PERSONAL FILE OF THE OFFICIAL CONCERNED AND IN THE DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE PROCEDURE FOR PROMOTION TO GRADE B 2 FOR THE YEAR 1978 .

IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES , THE APPLICATION MUST BE DISMISSED .

Operative part

ON THOSE GROUNDS ,

THE COURT ( FIRST CHAMBER ) HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :

THE APPLICATION CONCERNING THE TAKING INTO ACCOUNT AS RECOVERABLE COSTS OF THE TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPLICANT ' S JOURNEY TO LUXEMBOURG SO AS TO BE PRESENT AT THE HEARING IN PERSON IS DISMISSED .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia