I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-4/15)
(2015/C 065/73)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Beiersdorf AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Renck and J. Fuhrmann, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Q10’ — Application for registration No 11 480 837
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2014 in Case R 2050/2013-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 32(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.