I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-422/12 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure - Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark CLORALEX - Earlier national word mark CLOROX - Likelihood of confusion - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Cross-appeal - Article 176 of the Rules of Procedure - Requirement to introduce the cross-appeal by a separate document))
2014/C 112/18
Language of the case: Spanish
Appellant: Industrias Alen SA de CV (represented by: A. Padial Martinez, abogada)
Other parties to the proceedings: The Clorox Company (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 July 2012 in Case T-135/11 Clorox v OHIM — Industrias Alen (CLORALEX), by which that court annulled the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 December 2010 (Case R 521/2009-4).
1.The main appeal and the cross-appeal are dismissed.
2.Industrias Alen SA de CV is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by The Clorox Company.
3.The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) is to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 379, 8.12.2012.