I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
10.2.2025
(C/2025/741)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium) and five other applicants (represented by: A. Bailleux, lawyer)
Defendants: European Commission
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well-founded;
—annul the decision of the Commission of 26 June 2024, the French version of which was communicated to the applicants on 30 September 2024, rejecting the request for internal review of Implementing Regulation 2023/2660 of 28 November 2023 renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate, lodged by the applicants on 24 January 2024;
—order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.
In support of the action, the applicants rely on seven pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, concerning the toxicity assessment of the representative formulation MON 52276.
2.Second plea in law, concerning the genotoxicity assessment of glyphosate.
3.Third plea in law, concerning the carcinogenicity assessment of glyphosate.
4.Fourth plea in law, concerning the assessment of the effect of glyphosate on the microbiome.
5.Fifth plea in law, concerning the neurotoxicity and reproductive toxicity assessment of glyphosate.
6.Sixth plea in law, concerning the assessment of the effect of glyphosate on biodiversity.
7.Seventh plea in law, concerning the risk management relating to the use of glyphosate.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/741/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—