I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Appeal – Civil service – Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations – Psychological harassment – Duty to provide assistance – Distortion of facts – Errors in the legal assessment of the facts)
Appeal: against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 16 April 2008 in Case T‑486/04 Michail v Commission by which that court dismissed the appellant’s action for annulment of the Commission’s implied rejection of 20 March 2004 of the appellant’s application for assistance under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations. Infringement of Article 12 of the Staff Regulations. Psychological harassment. Distortion of the facts. Errors in the legal classification of the facts
Held: The appeal is dismissed. Mr Michail is ordered to pay the costs.
Appeals – Grounds – Mere repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the Court of First Instance – Error of law relied on not identified – Inadmissible
(Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 112(1), first para., (c))