EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-425/23: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 11 July 2023 — Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD, Agentsia za sabirane na vzemania EAD City Cash OOD

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0425

62023CN0425

July 11, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/118

16.10.2023

(Case C-425/23)

(C/2023/118)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants in the order for payment procedures: Profi Credit Bulgaria EOOD, Agentsia za sabirane na vzemania EAD City Cash OOD

Questions referred

1.Do Articles 6(1) and Article 7 of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) on unfair terms in consumer contracts (Directive 93/13/EEC) permit national case-law such as that at issue in the main proceedings under which

the court issuing an order for payment in respect of only part of the claims arising from a credit agreement has no jurisdiction to demand that the creditor indicate the amount of the instalments which are demanded of the consumer and is obliged, even in the absence of such information, to issue an order for payment in respect of the part of the claims which the creditor is pursuing as a lump sum?

2.Is Article 6(1) of Directive 93/12/EEC, read in conjunction with the principle of effectiveness of EU law and Article 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union, to be interpreted as meaning that

instructions to issue a decision on the substance which may infringe EU law and which require a lower court to comply with the will of the higher court — not by issuing a formal decision referring back to the decision of the higher court, but by a decision which is issued in the name of the formation of the lower court — are binding on the lower court and do not impinge on its independence as expressed in the lower court’s internal conviction as to whether a provision of EU law is applicable?

Language of the case: Bulgarian

(1) OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/118/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: Bulgarian

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia