- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-705/20: Action brought on 30 November 2020 — OI v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0705
62020TN0705
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.1.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 28/63
(Case T-705/20)
(2021/C 28/93)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: OI (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision not to include his name on the reserve list for internal competition COM/03/AD/18;
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, put forward principally, alleging failure to adequately state reasons. The applicant takes the view that the statement of reasons consists of literal assessments, which are not consistent with the grades awarded. Moreover, the selection panel has not communicated the assessment criteria adopted before the tests, so that neither the applicant nor the appointing authority were able to check the legality of those criteria.
2.Second plea in law, put forward in the alternative, alleging a manifest error of assessment committed by the selection panel since that panel was not in a position to justify to the requisite legal standard the manifest inconsistencies between the literal assessments and the numerical grades, having regard to a comparison with comparable assessments of other candidates.